Green Steel vs. Conventional: Exploring Pathways to a Sustainable Future
Steel is one of the most critical materials used in modern infrastructure and manufacturing, forming the backbone of everything from buildings to cars. Yet, this vital industry is also one of the largest sources of global carbon emissions. Traditional steel production accounts for approximately 2.8 billion tons of CO₂ each year—equivalent to 7% of yearly emissions worldwide. As the world moves toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions and meeting net-zero targets, the steel industry finds itself under increasing pressure to change. This has led to the emergence of "green steel" as a promising alternative, but the transition is fraught with challenges and uncertainties.
Comparing Conventional and Green Steel Production
The conventional steelmaking process relies heavily on coal, particularly coking coal, which is used in blast furnaces to reduce iron ore to produce molten iron. This method is highly energy-intensive and emits large quantities of CO₂. In contrast, green steel aims to minimize emissions through various technologies and processes. The most promising methods include hydrogen-based Direct Reduction of Iron (DRI) and electric arc furnaces (EAF) powered by renewable electricity. Hydrogen, when produced using renewable energy, can act as a reducing agent, replacing coal and significantly cutting emissions. However, the technology is still being developed and faces cost and infrastructure barriers.
The UK Steel Market: Struggling for Competitiveness
The UK steel industry is facing significant headwinds. With production at historic lows of just 5.6 million tonnes in 2023, and domestic demand dropping to 7.6 million tonnes, the market is increasingly reliant on imports to fill the gap. Net imports reached 4.6 million tonnes last year, capturing 60% of the UK’s market share—up from 55% the year before. This rise in imports has been fueled by cheaper steel from Asia and Europe, where lower electricity costs allow producers to undercut UK firms.
In 2023, the UK steel industry directly contributed £1.8 billion to the UK economy and an added £2.4 billion through supply chains, as well as £3.4 billion to the UK’s balance of trade.
The push for green steel is not just about cutting emissions; it's also about future-proofing an industry critical to the global economy. As countries ramp up their climate policies and regulations, companies that can produce low-carbon steel will have a distinct advantage. Automotive manufacturers, construction firms, and other steel consumers are already seeking greener supply chains to meet their own sustainability goals. Failing to adapt could mean losing market share and being left behind as industries transition.
The Challenges for Green Steel
Despite its promise, green steel production faces several challenges. First and foremost is the issue of cost. Producing steel using hydrogen or renewable electricity is currently more expensive than conventional methods. The infrastructure needed to produce and transport green hydrogen is not yet fully developed, and renewable electricity remains more expensive in many regions. There are also technical challenges, such as scaling up new technologies and ensuring consistent production quality.
For the UK specifically, the high cost of electricity and limited availability of low-carbon energy sources present additional obstacles. Without significant investment and policy support, the transition to green steel may be slow and uncompetitive compared to countries with more favorable conditions.
The Future of Steel: Finding the Balance
The future of the steel industry will likely be a combination of technologies and strategies. Hybrid solutions that mix hydrogen-based and traditional processes could serve as a transitional approach, while increased use of scrap steel in electric arc furnaces could reduce the need for virgin steel production. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology, though not yet proven at scale, may also play a role in reducing emissions from existing blast furnaces.
Pathways to a Low-Carbon Future
Hydrogen-based Direct Reduction of Iron (DRI): This process uses hydrogen instead of coal as a reducing agent, potentially reducing emissions by up to 95%. However, it requires access to large quantities of green hydrogen, which is still expensive and limited in supply.
Electric Arc Furnaces (EAF) with Renewable Power: EAFs can produce steel from recycled scrap using electricity, which, if sourced from renewables, can significantly cut emissions.
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): While not a long-term solution, CCS can capture up to 90% of emissions from conventional blast furnaces, providing an interim step toward decarbonization.
Hybrid Approaches: Combining hydrogen DRI with CCS or using a mix of conventional and green technologies can help industries transition without the need for immediate large-scale changes.
The journey to green steel is complex and multifaceted. While the technology holds great potential, significant investment, policy support, and international cooperation will be necessary to overcome current challenges. As the industry evolves, it will be crucial to find a balance between economic viability and environmental responsibility to ensure that steel production aligns with global climate goals.
Click image for full view in new tab